EN DE
Lesson 10 · Flight Performance & Planning

Flight Planning Capstone

One complete VFR cross-country, end to end — mass, levels, nav log and fuel brought together, EASA PPL theory

⏱ ~20 min ✈ SEP · VFR 📋 EASA Part-FCL

1 — From Four Skills to One Plan

Every lesson in the Planning block solved one piece. The capstone joins them into the single product a pilot actually carries to the aeroplane: a flight plan that says you can make the trip safely, legally and with fuel to spare. The pieces go together in a sensible order:

Planning a VFR cross-country — the order of work
  1. 1
    Mass & balanceLesson 6
    Load within the CG envelope and under the maximum takeoff mass.
  2. 2
    PerformanceLessons 2 & 5
    Check takeoff and landing distances against the runways you’ll use.
  3. 3
    Route & cruising levelLesson 8
    Draw the legs; pick a VFR cruising level for each magnetic track.
  4. 4
    Navigation logLesson 9
    Wind triangle → heading, groundspeed and time for every leg.
  5. 5
    FuelLesson 7
    Trip + contingency + alternate + final reserve, checked against usable fuel.
  6. 6
    Final checksPre-flight
    Weather, NOTAM, landing mass — then a clear go / no-go decision.

Nothing here is new — it’s weight & balance (Lesson 6), performance (Lessons 2 & 5), cruising levels (Lesson 8), the navigation log (Lesson 9) and fuel (Lesson 7), run in sequence and then sanity-checked as a whole.

2 — The Route and Its Cruising Levels

Draw the route on the chart: departure, turning points, destination, and an alternate in case the destination is unusable. Measure each leg’s magnetic track and distance, then choose a VFR cruising level for each track using the semicircular rule (Lesson 8).

The route — three trip legs and an alternate
VFR cruising level 5 500 ft · eastbound 080° · 24 NM 110° · 20 NM 095° · 28 NM 150° · 16 NM A B C D E Departure Destination Alternate

Schematic. Tracks are magnetic and distances in NM, as measured on the chart. The alternate leg (D→E) is flown only if the destination is unusable.

Our example runs A → B → C → D with D → E as the alternate. Every leg here is eastbound (000–179°), so each takes an odd-thousands + 500 ft level — we’ll plan 5 500 ft for the whole route. A westbound leg would have taken an even-thousands + 500 ft level instead.

3 — Compute the Whole Trip

Now run the navigation log for every leg and roll it into a fuel plan. The wind triangle gives each leg its heading, groundspeed, time and fuel; the legs sum into trip fuel; then the Part-NCO blocks — contingency, alternate and final reserve — stack on top to give the block fuel you must have on board. Compare that to your usable fuel and you have a margin:

Flight plan — compute the whole trip
LegTrackDist Mag hdgGSTimeFuel
Taxi fuel
Trip fuel
Contingency (5%)
Alternate fuel
Final reserve (30 min)
Block fuel
Usable fuel
Margin

Fixed route (variation 2°E, taxi 3 L, 120 L usable). Wind triangle per leg → magnetic heading, groundspeed, time and fuel; legs summed into trip fuel, then the Part-NCO reserves. Illustrative figures — your POH and current charts are the only ones that count.

Watch the wind work through the whole plan
Turn the wind up and every number downstream moves: a stronger headwind component lowers groundspeed → legs take longer → more fuel burned → the margin shrinks. One change ripples through heading, time, fuel and the go/no-go. That is why the plan is checked as a whole, not leg by leg.

4 — The Go / No-Go Decision

The plan is only finished when you decide. Fuel is the headline check, but it isn’t the only one:

  • Fuel — block fuel must fit inside usable fuel with margin. No margin, or a negative one, means reduce load, add fuel, or replan (a slower power setting, a closer alternate, a fuel stop).
  • Mass at landing — you burn fuel off in flight, so check the CG and mass at both takeoff and zero-fuel/landing (Lesson 6). Both must sit in the envelope.
  • Performance — takeoff and landing distances must fit the runways at the day’s density altitude (Lessons 1, 2, 5).
  • The day — weather, NOTAM, daylight, airspace. Any one of these can turn a numerically valid plan into a no-go.

The capstone check
A good plan answers three questions with a clear yes: Will it balance? (mass & CG, takeoff and landing) · Will it perform? (runway distances at today’s density altitude) · Will it reach — with reserves? (nav log time and fuel, block inside usable). Any “no” sends you back to replan, not to the runway.

Knowledge Check

Question 1
When planning a VFR cross-country, mass & balance and performance are checked:
Question 2
Every leg of the example route is eastbound, so the chosen VFR cruising level is:
Question 3
A stronger headwind component on the legs will:
Question 4
Your computed block fuel exceeds your usable fuel. The correct response is to:
Question 5
Why must CG and mass be checked at landing as well as takeoff?

Keep this project free

Support new lessons

This platform is independent, free, and ad-free. If it helps your training, your support helps fund new lesson production, visuals, and hosting.

Every contribution keeps high-quality learning open for everyone.